tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10666901.post5223690368011281982..comments2024-01-14T01:51:23.999-05:00Comments on DuckRabbit: Existential generalizationDuckhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11349267352262603510noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10666901.post-43556694783609650692008-07-05T02:18:00.000-04:002008-07-05T02:18:00.000-04:00Thanks vernunft, that's got to be it. In this sen...Thanks vernunft, that's got to be it. In this sense, General X, a Major General, isn't a "general". In the military context, that's fine, but for the purposes of this quiz, it strikes me as – and I say this with all respect for the dignity of mentally disabled persons everywhere – retarded.<BR/><BR/>Oh, and "higher" than "general" in this sense? Field Marshal. You're welcome.Duckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11349267352262603510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10666901.post-39922324073391280042008-07-04T21:16:00.000-04:002008-07-04T21:16:00.000-04:00Only a four-star general could appropriately be sa...Only a four-star general could appropriately be said to have achieved the rank of general. I mean, if they want to split hairs, which apparently they do, being sacks.Vernunfthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16652751092085432868noreply@blogger.com